<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About William Thomas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willthomasonline.wordpress.com/about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willthomasonline.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>William Thomas Online Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 22:48:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: willthomasonline</title>
		<link>http://willthomasonline.wordpress.com/about/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>willthomasonline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-170</guid>
		<description>I have no idea - though I am skeptical. Using a Tri-Field meter would tell this tale. (One buyer said he did - and the product works...) My issue with fairy dust and magic crystal &quot;shields&quot; is that many people think they&#039;re protected when they&#039;re not - and increase their exposure accordingly. Best and cheapest defense is to keep your distance from EMF-emitting appliances around the home. Even three-feet is usually enough. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea &#8211; though I am skeptical. Using a Tri-Field meter would tell this tale. (One buyer said he did &#8211; and the product works&#8230;) My issue with fairy dust and magic crystal &#8220;shields&#8221; is that many people think they&#8217;re protected when they&#8217;re not &#8211; and increase their exposure accordingly. Best and cheapest defense is to keep your distance from EMF-emitting appliances around the home. Even three-feet is usually enough. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Thomas</title>
		<link>http://willthomasonline.wordpress.com/about/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Hi Guy, 
Looks like the oligarchy (greedheads) went too far this time. People are getting riled. And it&#039;s about time. Thing now is to put this passion into creative change! Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guy,<br />
Looks like the oligarchy (greedheads) went too far this time. People are getting riled. And it&#8217;s about time. Thing now is to put this passion into creative change! Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willthomasonline</title>
		<link>http://willthomasonline.wordpress.com/about/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>willthomasonline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-166</guid>
		<description>I called up a former air force pilot close by who had aimed his &quot;orgone generator&quot; at a chemtrail-laced sky  - and politely asked him why it wasn&#039;t working.

No reply.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I called up a former air force pilot close by who had aimed his &#8220;orgone generator&#8221; at a chemtrail-laced sky  &#8211; and politely asked him why it wasn&#8217;t working.</p>
<p>No reply.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willthomasonline</title>
		<link>http://willthomasonline.wordpress.com/about/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>willthomasonline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment. Actually, I fixed this quite awhile ago,  Langley. The perils of cut &#039;n&#039; paste. And going too fast. The workload on one (unpaid) person researching, editing and running a blog and a website is nuts. Still, what&#039;s the point you rightly ask with screw-ups like this!

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment. Actually, I fixed this quite awhile ago,  Langley. The perils of cut &#8216;n&#8217; paste. And going too fast. The workload on one (unpaid) person researching, editing and running a blog and a website is nuts. Still, what&#8217;s the point you rightly ask with screw-ups like this!</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willthomasonline</title>
		<link>http://willthomasonline.wordpress.com/about/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>willthomasonline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Hi Pauline,

Short answer: Greenpeace - whom I have worked with in successful pulp mill cleanup campaigns - acknowledges the issue but says they do not have the resources to campaign around chemtrails. From my personal experience with their extreme reluctance to intervene before the oil fires were lit during Desert Storm, there reason (stated in Germany, where it became a major public issue) is code for: &quot;This issue is too controversial and politically dangerous to identify with.&quot; 

As an &quot;environmentalist&quot; myself (aren&#039;t we all?) - the reluctance of eco groups freaking out over climate change to deal with one of the major causes of atmospheric upset - and one that governments can stop immediately - is... bizarre. 

As for Hollywood -  at the request of a well-connected producer I wrote a chemtrails &quot;thriller&quot; script. But no one would make it. (Imagine trying to get the US Air Force to provide planes and access!)  Thank you again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pauline,</p>
<p>Short answer: Greenpeace &#8211; whom I have worked with in successful pulp mill cleanup campaigns &#8211; acknowledges the issue but says they do not have the resources to campaign around chemtrails. From my personal experience with their extreme reluctance to intervene before the oil fires were lit during Desert Storm, there reason (stated in Germany, where it became a major public issue) is code for: &#8220;This issue is too controversial and politically dangerous to identify with.&#8221; </p>
<p>As an &#8220;environmentalist&#8221; myself (aren&#8217;t we all?) &#8211; the reluctance of eco groups freaking out over climate change to deal with one of the major causes of atmospheric upset &#8211; and one that governments can stop immediately &#8211; is&#8230; bizarre. </p>
<p>As for Hollywood &#8211;  at the request of a well-connected producer I wrote a chemtrails &#8220;thriller&#8221; script. But no one would make it. (Imagine trying to get the US Air Force to provide planes and access!)  Thank you again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willthomasonline</title>
		<link>http://willthomasonline.wordpress.com/about/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>willthomasonline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Nick,
I&#039;m not impressed either! Proofreading is a nightmare for writers because I/we auto-edit (filter) my/our typos - while fresh eyes instantly spot my glitches. Want to help?  Also, I&#039;ve added the &quot;date posted&quot;  widget on my archive sidebar. Thanks again for taking time to comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Nick,<br />
I&#8217;m not impressed either! Proofreading is a nightmare for writers because I/we auto-edit (filter) my/our typos &#8211; while fresh eyes instantly spot my glitches. Want to help?  Also, I&#8217;ve added the &#8220;date posted&#8221;  widget on my archive sidebar. Thanks again for taking time to comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coleen</title>
		<link>http://willthomasonline.wordpress.com/about/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>coleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-155</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t a rant but a comment about &quot;off stream&quot; media, videos and such. The internet is rife with alternate media sites, ideas, conspiracy theories, environmental concerns, political exposes etc. I have been surfing about out there and have posted a modest variety of what I&#039;ve found on an &quot;open&quot; facebook group called &quot;Human Conduct.&quot; For those of you that are curious, please visit the group. Serious comments are welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t a rant but a comment about &#8220;off stream&#8221; media, videos and such. The internet is rife with alternate media sites, ideas, conspiracy theories, environmental concerns, political exposes etc. I have been surfing about out there and have posted a modest variety of what I&#8217;ve found on an &#8220;open&#8221; facebook group called &#8220;Human Conduct.&#8221; For those of you that are curious, please visit the group. Serious comments are welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pauline</title>
		<link>http://willthomasonline.wordpress.com/about/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Pauline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Mr. Thomas, your website on Chemtrails is incrediably accurate.  Thank you for the valuable information.  Many websites regarding Chemtrails just don&#039;t come across ....as reputable as yours.
A huge question for myself, and I&#039;m sure for you too, and others, with all the evidence of Chemtrails in the sky, all over the world,  where are the envirnmeentalists and leading hollywood celeb&#039;s that are always in the media about envirnmental issues, such as this?  They make there voices known on every other subject and the media is there to cover,  why not the recognition and concern not coming from these two groups?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Thomas, your website on Chemtrails is incrediably accurate.  Thank you for the valuable information.  Many websites regarding Chemtrails just don&#8217;t come across &#8230;.as reputable as yours.<br />
A huge question for myself, and I&#8217;m sure for you too, and others, with all the evidence of Chemtrails in the sky, all over the world,  where are the envirnmeentalists and leading hollywood celeb&#8217;s that are always in the media about envirnmental issues, such as this?  They make there voices known on every other subject and the media is there to cover,  why not the recognition and concern not coming from these two groups?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://willthomasonline.wordpress.com/about/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-150</guid>
		<description>I am a mother of two living in Florida.  Sprayings are a weekly occurance.  I have pictures to prove it.  I was pointing my camera towards the sky and the two girls who live next door asked me why I was taking a picture of the x in the sky.  I also have a picture of that common x pattern over my daughter&#039;s school/church.  Driving up to her school and seeing that made me very angry.  The realization that there is nobody to scream at and nowhere to turn can be devastating.  I wish I never found out about chemtrails and HAARP.  I wish I could look at the sky the way I used to.  I wish I could trust the government and the all the people that swore to protect us.  They have children too.   This was planned long before I was born.  The secrets run deep.  No one person can penetrate their secrecy.  Those who chose money over human life will have to pay one way or another.  I believe in Karma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a mother of two living in Florida.  Sprayings are a weekly occurance.  I have pictures to prove it.  I was pointing my camera towards the sky and the two girls who live next door asked me why I was taking a picture of the x in the sky.  I also have a picture of that common x pattern over my daughter&#8217;s school/church.  Driving up to her school and seeing that made me very angry.  The realization that there is nobody to scream at and nowhere to turn can be devastating.  I wish I never found out about chemtrails and HAARP.  I wish I could look at the sky the way I used to.  I wish I could trust the government and the all the people that swore to protect us.  They have children too.   This was planned long before I was born.  The secrets run deep.  No one person can penetrate their secrecy.  Those who chose money over human life will have to pay one way or another.  I believe in Karma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Langley</title>
		<link>http://willthomasonline.wordpress.com/about/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Langley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-148</guid>
		<description>&#039;I am an award-winning Canadian journalist specializing in health and environment. During and immediately after the Gulf War, he served five months in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait as a member of a three-man environmental emergency response team.&#039;

Your very first paragraph marks you as a poor writer.  First you say &#039;I&#039;, then you say &#039;he&#039;, both times presumably referring to yourself.  If you can&#039;t get simple grammar right, why should you be trusted with big ideas?  Get your act together, man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;I am an award-winning Canadian journalist specializing in health and environment. During and immediately after the Gulf War, he served five months in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait as a member of a three-man environmental emergency response team.&#8217;</p>
<p>Your very first paragraph marks you as a poor writer.  First you say &#8216;I&#8217;, then you say &#8216;he&#8217;, both times presumably referring to yourself.  If you can&#8217;t get simple grammar right, why should you be trusted with big ideas?  Get your act together, man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
